Zhoushan, a taxi taxi two wheel unloading story bizarre twists and turns-aquaria

Zhoushan taxi driver taxi two wheels were unloading middle bizarre story twists and turns in September 17th, Mr. Fan Zhoushan people give us the call that his taxi, two wheels being removed. What enmity, what blame, look down quickly. On the parking lot, Mr. Fan’s taxi was blocked by a private car, and the two front wheels of the taxi were not available. Mr. Fan said that the taxi was his own, and he parked it here around ten. "He put the car, here I will call the police, he wouldn’t let me go back to the police station is not blocked, back two wheel is gone, I seem to be back at eleven o’clock." Mr. Fan mouth "he", also do the taxi business, liu. Just now, Mr. Liu is coming. Mr. Liu: "my own wheel unloading, I admit it, I do things I admit, if I owe you money, you must be on the road blocking me, I ride a cable car you have blocked me." Wait, who owes the money? According to the statement, comparing it to the debt, complex: Mr. Liu told the taxi company contracted a taxi, the taxi contracted to Mr. Liu, Mr. Fan, the two sides signed the contract, the contract period of all responsibility for the accident by Mr. Fan bear. Mr. Fan and the taxi contracted surnamed Yan sir, Mr. Yan took the taxi contracted to Mr. Zhao and Mr. Zhao not operating certificate, during February 2015, Mr. Zhao operation accident caused the death of one person, the about 800000 yuan compensation, the insurance company is not compensable. Mr. Liu delivered about 300000, and the remaining about 500000, the taxi company first advance. Company to beg for him, he had to beg for Mr Fan, more than a year, Mr. Fan has not give. Mr. Liu: "he (Mr. Fan) all day Mandaijie (run rental) so don’t ask me directly, and he ordered a contract, I will recover my money, companies are chasing me, to pad out of the money, just like me, I have no money, I can come up with me your attitude, take the car to the debt, you can also offset." Mr. Fan said that he does not give, he has been working to Mr. Yan and Mr. Yan, but also to the driver Mr. Zhao beg, this chain is very long. "If you have something to discuss, the wheel should not be unloaded. We can go the legal way, or what?"." Lawyer believes that Mr. Liu has the right to recover from Mr. Fan, but Mr. Liu’s debt collection is illegal. Zhejiang Pinzheng union lawyer Chen Yiyi said: "if he (Liu) sought power through legitimate means, through coordination, through to the court, can, if you are using the damaged belongings of others, in serious cases, may even be criminal responsibility." As for bilateral economic disputes, lawyers believe that Mr. Fan has a taxi for the implementation of the present, Mr. Liu can sue to the court according to the law of the fan of the property preservation, guarantee their rights and interests are not compromised, but the prosecution object can only be Mr. fan. Lawyer Chen: "according to the principle of privity of contract between Mr. Liu and Mr. Fan is the existence of a contractual relationship, but between Mr. Liu and Mr. Yan is no relationship, so he should be Mr. Liu, Mr. fan can only recover, then.

舟山一的哥出租车两车轮被卸 中间故事离奇曲折 9月17日,舟山市民范先生给我们打来电话说,他的出租车,两个轮子被人给卸走了。什么仇什么怨,赶紧往下看。停车位上,范先生的出租车被一辆私家车堵着,出租车的两个前轮没有了。范先生说出租车是他自己的,当天十点左右他将车停在了这里。“他把车扣了,我这边就报警了,他就不让我走 堵着到派出所回来就没了,回来两个轮就没了,我好像十一点钟回来的。”范先生口中的“他”,也做出租车生意,姓刘。正说着,刘先生来了。刘先生:“车轮我自己卸的,这我承认,我自己做的事情我就自己承认,假如说我欠你的钱,你在路上肯定堵着我,我骑个电瓶车你也要堵着我。”等等,谁欠谁的钱?根据双方陈述,这里面的债务关系,比较复杂:刘先生曾向出租车公司承包一辆出租车,刘先生把出租车承包给了范先生,双方签定承包合同,承包期间所有事故责任由范先生承担。而范先生把出租车承包给了一名姓闫的先生,那位闫先生又把出租车承包给了赵先生,而赵先生没有营运资格证,2015年2月,赵先生营运期间发生车祸造成一人死亡,产生了80多万元的赔偿金,保险公司不予理赔。刘先生交付了30多万,其余50多万,出租车公司先垫付了。公司向他讨要,他只能向范先生讨要,一年多了,范先生始终不给。刘先生:“他(范先生)整天满大街(跑出租)就这样不管不问,我直接和他订的有合同,就是我要追讨我的钱,公司也在向我追,公司要垫出来的钱,就像我一样,我没钱,我可以拿出我自己的态度,拿车去抵债,你也可以抵。”范先生说,他不是不给,他也一直在向闫先生讨要,而闫先生又要向肇事司机赵先生讨要,这条关系链,很长。“有事情商量一下,轮子卸掉不应该,我们可以走法律途径或者是怎么样。”律师认为,刘先生有权向范先生追偿,但刘先生采取的追债方式,不合法。浙江品正恒联律师事务所律师 陈以一:“如果说他(刘先生)要求主张权力,可以通过合法的手段,通过协调,通过向法院起诉,都可以,如果是采用这种损毁别人财物,情节严重的,甚至有可能承担刑事责任。”而对于双方的经济纠纷,律师认为,范先生目前有一辆可供执行的出租车,刘先生可以向法院起诉,依法对范先生的财产进行保全,保证自己的权益不受损害,但起诉的对象只能是范先生。陈律师:“根据合同相对性的原则刘先生和范先生之间是存在合同关系的,但是刘先生和闫先生之间是没有任何关系的,所以刘先生他应当只能追偿范先生,那么范先生赔偿之后,他可以自行再向闫先生进行追偿。”闫先生并不是车祸责任人,但他却将出租车承包给了没有营运资质的赵先生,那么闫先生和赵先生又各承担什么样的法律责任呢?陈律师:“闫先生把车辆交给一个没有正常营运资质的赵先生,从法律上讲是有明显过错的,但是关键还是看他和赵先生之间的合同约定,如果有关于损失承担的约定,按约定来,如果没有约定的,根据双方各自的过错比例,来承担相应的法律责任。”咱把这事再捋一遍,刘先生把承包的出租车转包给了范先生,范先生又把出租车转包给了闫先生,闫先生又转包给了赵先生,赵先生没有营运资格,出事儿了,简直像读绕口令。我想透过“弯弯绕”,把安全这个头等大事,给绕进去了。相关的主题文章: