The man bought huge betrothal marriage cohabitation is less than 3 months.-chompoo araya

The man bought huge betrothal marriage cohabitation less than 3 months will break the original title: huge betrothal marriage cohabitation broke up in March to buy legal network in Zhengzhou on 9 October, (Niu Yanjun Zou Pengju Li Dandan) October 9, 2016, Fugou County People’s Court concluded with the marriage of property dispute case, the verdict the defendant Chen C, Chen Ding, Mao Mouyi in ten days after this judgment in force returned to the plaintiff Li Moujia, Li Mouyi 88400 yuan; the defendant Chen C dowry: quilt 12, a wooden frame, one owned by the defendant Chen Moubing all. Li Moujia and Chen C free love engagement. 2015 lunar July 26th engaged in the house to Chen Ding engaged the bride price 36000 yuan; in 2015 September 9th of the lunar calendar in the home to Ding Caili Chen 80000 yuan; in 2015 September 16th of the lunar calendar in the house to Chen C with the bride price 24000 yuan; Chen C telephone recording admission, the court found the three defendants to accept the bride price to 136000 yuan. Another investigation, Chen C dowry: 12, a wooden bed, wash basin a Li Moujia home now. Chen C left the Li Moujia family to live in her home on 2015 lunar calendar in November 20th. Fugou court held that: Li Moujia and Chen Mou did not apply for marriage registration cohabitation relationship. The dissolution of cohabitation does not need statutory procedures, and the two parties can relieve themselves. Property relations due to cohabitation is engaged, "marriage" to accept betrothal gifts should be appropriate to return, in this case, Chen C, Chen Mouding, Mao Mouyi meter accepted the plaintiff bride price money 136000 yuan, because of Li Moujia and Chen C living for a short time is living under the age of three months, the press sixty-five percent the return of three, the defendant shall return the plaintiff bride price money 88400 yuan. The dowry of Chen Mou of the defendant is owned by Chen mou. According to the relevant provisions of the law, made the above judgment.

男子巨额彩礼买婚姻 同居不满3个月就分手原标题:巨额彩礼买婚姻 同居三月也分手法制网郑州10月9日电(牛艳军 邹鹏举 李丹丹 )2016年10月9日,扶沟县人民法院审结一起婚约财产纠纷案,一审判决被告陈某丙、陈某丁、毛某乙于本判决生效后十日内返回给原告李某甲、李某乙88400元人民币;被告陈某丙的嫁妆:被子12条、木箱一个、盆架一个归被告陈某丙所有。李某甲与陈某丙自由恋爱订婚。2015年农历7月26日订婚,在被告家送给陈某丁订婚彩礼36000元;2015年农历9月9日在被告家送给陈某丁彩礼80000元;2015年农历9月16日在被告家送给陈某丙彩礼24000元;结合陈某丙电话录音自认,本院认定三被告接受彩礼款为136000元。另查明,陈某丙嫁妆:被子12条、木箱一个、洗脸盆架一个现在李某甲家中。陈某丙于2015年农历11月20日离开李某甲家回娘家居住。扶沟法院审理认为:李某甲与陈某丙系没办理结婚登记的同居关系。同居关系的解除不需要经过法定程序,双方可以自行解除。因同居关系而产生的财产关系即为订婚、“结婚”所接受彩礼应适当返还,本案中,陈某丙、陈某丁、毛某乙计接受原告方彩礼款136000元,因李某甲与陈某丙同居生活时间较短即同居生活未满三个月,酌定按百分之六十五返还,即三被告应返还原告彩礼款88400元。被告陈某丙的嫁妆归陈某丙所有。遂依据有关法律规定,作出上述判决。相关的主题文章: